// you’re reading...


Review: Nike Sumo Irons


The SQ Sumo has left the tee box…

Today we’ll have a look at a new iron design from Nike Golf. The Nike Sumo irons take some of the technology and design ideas from the SQ Sumo drivers and apply it to the iron game. Nike PowerBow design and an ultra-light Cryo Steel face combine to deliver an expanded COR and high MOI. Now your entire game can experience the power of geometry.

Nike Sumo Irons - 5

SQ Sumo Iron Geometry: Long blade length, wide sole and Nike PowerBow design deliver an extreme perimeter-weighted club and our heighest MOI iron set yet.

Nike PowerBow Weighting: Weight is to move the CG low and deep, increasing the MOI and creating a more stable iron at impact.

TPU Insert: A soft vibration dampening TPU material that dampens unwanted vibration at impact.

Nike Sumo Iron Specifications

The Nike Sumo Irons are setup with relatively conservative lofts and lengths. Sure, 46* PW is stronger than what you would have seen 10 years ago, but at least they have not yet jumped to the 44* PW realm yet.

Nike Sumo Irons - 1

Look and Feel

Reading various golf forums, I have heard a lot of mixed reactions to the look of the Nike Sumo Irons. Personally, I love the way they look. At first glance, yes, they are a little strange looking, but I like different. Your initial thought may be, wow, that’s a huge sole…or be put off by the seemingly thick top-line. However, at address, these characteristics are less worrisome. The bright yellow insert in the bottom channel on the back of the club is pretty neat looking as well, if nothing else, it gives the irons a distinctive appearance.

Nike Sumo Irons - 2

Aside from looking neat, the rubbery yellow insert helps dampen the effect of mis-hits. It has been pretty cold here the past few days, and trust me, the little yellow insert (along with the graphite shafts) completely takes the sting out of a thinned 4 iron.

At address, it’s hard not to feel like you’re going to get a good piece of the ball with any sort of swing. Think back to the first time you hit a 460cc driver. No doubt, you thought, how the heck am I going to swing this thing. But you did, and you found how ridiculously forgiving it could be. Now apply that thinking to your irons.

While the top-line looks pretty thick when you first glance at the club, at address, it really didn’t bother me much. It actually looked pretty similar to that of the Callaway X-20 irons, which aren’t too much thicker than the Callaway X-Tour irons.

Nike Sumo Irons - 3 Nike Sumo Irons - 5

The Nike Sumo irons are relatively offset, and for someone who plays with player irons, this may be visually bothersome and result in the occasional hook. That being said, I do not think Nike is trying to market these irons to those who play blades anyway. I have been playing irons with little to no offset lately, and the offset of these irons was difficult to deal with at first, but a few balls at the range, and it really wasn’t much of a problem.


My first swing with one of these clubs was the pitching wedge in the fields behind our place. I took a very easy swing at it, and the ball rocketed off the face, launched high, plateaued and seemed to hang in the air forever. I thought, wow, I MUST get to the range immediately and give these clubs a complete workout.

In general, I found the Sumo Irons to be at least 10 yards longer than the other irons I have been playing recently. This is probably due to a combination of the lighter graphite shafts and the slightly stronger lofts (PW 46* instead of 47* or 48*). To Nike’s credit, the lofts on the Sumo irons are not completely jacked up. I have seen plenty of sets of super game improvement irons where the PW loft is set to 44*. In my book, that’s a 9 iron.

Nike Sumo Irons - 4

The image below is of (from left to right) a Callaway X-Tour, Callaway X-20 and Nike Sumo 7 iron. As you can see, the Nike Sumo irons have a lot of length in the blade. According to Nike, this increases the perimeter weighting, thus increasing this effective MOI of the club. I certainly noticed the extra length at first glance, but it wasn’t distracting once I put the clubs in play. The extra width behind the ball actually may have helped a bit with aligning the club face to the target.

Callaway X-Tour, X-20 and Nike Sumo Irons

Again, in the image below we have (from left to right) a Callaway X-Tour, Callaway X-20 and Nike Sumo 7 iron. This image clearly shows how wide the sole is on the Nike Sumo. I wish I had a set of Callaway Wide Sole Fusion irons to compare. If you have a problem with digging or catching on mis-hits, the wide sole may help you out with that. It may also offer some more confidence, especially to those who love the look/feel of hybrids/fairway woods. The wide, deep sole also lowers the center of gravity, making it easier to get the ball up in the air as well as increasing the club’s MOI. It really does work too, I tried to hit some fat shots, that normally would have resulted in some very deep divots with my thin sole irons, and couldn’t do it to save my life. The club generally just glides over the ground, and you still manage a decent shot.

Callaway X-Tour, X-20 and Nike Sumo Irons

The clubs I tested were fitted with the iDiamana graphite iron shafts. These are very lightweight yet seem to be quite stable. You will definitely see some increased club head speed with these shafts on your clubs. You will also, most likely, launch the ball higher. Ball flight, with this shaft seemed to get pretty flat pretty quickly, which should help in windy conditions. I hit the irons under rather windy conditions on a couple occasions, and the ball seemed to get through the wind pretty easy.

Nike Sumo iDiamana Shaft


I have been impressed with the Nike Sumo Irons. At first, the look may be a little bit of a shock, but it really has grown on me. The little notch design on the sole really looks neat. The contrasting yellow/black color scheme on the back of the iron stands out. All in all, I think they are a great looking set of irons.

Nike Sumo Irons - 6 Nike Sumo Irons - 7

If you are a mid to high handicapper, and are looking for a new set of irons, you MUST add the Nike Sumo Irons to your list of clubs to check out. Hit the ball just about anywhere on the face and the ball will launch pretty high and straight. Looking to add about 10 yards to your game? A lot of clubs make that bold statement, and deliver perhaps 1-2 yards…but these irons really did hit the ball about a club longer than what I have been playing.

If you like this post then please consider subscribing to our full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox. You can also follow me on twitter if you are interested in even more Deep Rough content!


31 comments for “Review: Nike Sumo Irons”

  1. Great review and pics.

    Posted by Golfer | November 6, 2007, 2:30 pm
  2. Sean,

    Do you take these pics when you do equipment reviews? If so, wow!

    Posted by Mike Pedersen Golf | November 6, 2007, 6:34 pm
  3. Mike,

    Thanks! Yeah, I take the pictures myself. Canon 400d, some of these were taken with a macro lens, some with a 50mm lens.

    And thanks, Golfer, glad you liked the review. Nice to see some comments from international readers! My sister actually lives in Sweden at the moment!


    Posted by DeepRough | November 6, 2007, 7:46 pm
  4. Sean, I agree with Mike — great pics!

    Posted by The Armchair Golfer | November 7, 2007, 9:16 pm
  5. Wow excellent review and pics! Good work.

    Matt from england.

    Posted by Matt | November 16, 2007, 5:27 am
  6. I went to a local club fitting professional a couple of days ago and hit at least 8 different sets of irons. These included the new Taylor Made R7 Irons, Callaway X-20, Ping G-10, Nike Sling Shot 4D, Mizuno MX-19, & Nike Sumo Irons.

    I must say that I was aiming to get the Taylor Made R7 Irons, but I hit two clubs extremely well….The Ping Irons, and the New Nike Sumo’s. It was a toss up. I hit the Ping Irons well and it was easy to get the ball in the air. The nike Irons were equally easy to hit and they went a full 10 yards longer. The nike yellow insert made a huge difference at impact (less vibration).

    I chose to take home the Sumo Irons and am very happy with the decision.

    Posted by Tyron Caswell | November 23, 2007, 1:40 pm
  7. we thought we were crazy for golfing in 12 degree weather.It was even more crazy that a nike rep had his tent set up on a day like this.After trying the new sumo irons,i could not help but pull out my checkbook.These irons are freekin awesome.I just got a new set of R7s for my bithday in september.save some money and try these irons first.

    Posted by jarrod gibson | December 5, 2007, 6:31 am
  8. Do you have a preference between the Callaway X-20s and the Nike Sumo? I’m personally torn between the two and would love an expert’s opinion.

    Posted by Dave | March 16, 2008, 6:34 pm
  9. I preferred the feel of the x-20 to the sumos. Though the sumos were very…very easy to hit straight. So if you’re looking for something super game improvement and little feel, go with the Sumos. If you want something with a little better feel, go with the x-20.

    One other thing to think about is resale value. The Callaway irons generally hold their value very well. Where as nike irons seem to drop rather quickly.

    Posted by Sean | March 16, 2008, 7:00 pm
  10. hey great review. I’ve been eyeing these clubs and wasn’t sure how they played. I’ve hit them at Golfsmith and they felt pretty good but seeing as how it is still wintery here in Chicago I couldn’t really gauge the “on course factor”. But from your review I definitely will put them on my too buy list!

    Posted by Paul | March 25, 2008, 1:38 pm
  11. Thanks Paul, if you do end up picking them up, good luck with them. Be sure to let us know how you make out with the sumo irons!

    Posted by Sean | March 25, 2008, 8:39 pm
  12. Great review. How would you compare the Sumo irons to the 2008 Calloway Big Bertha set that includes their “I-brids”?

    Posted by Tom | March 26, 2008, 8:13 pm
  13. Tom, I haven’t hit the 2008 big berthas or i-brids…based on seeing them though, they seem pretty similar. Very wide soles, ‘square’ hybrids.

    I played a set of 2006 big berthas on a vacation once, very easy to hit.

    Posted by Sean | March 27, 2008, 8:28 am
  14. Just bought a set of Nike Sumo Irons. They have increased the consistency of my game and have increased my iron distance between 6-10 yards per club. The loft of the clubs throw you until you realise you can probably drop a club for most shots.

    All in all a great set of Irons

    Posted by Chris | September 22, 2008, 3:28 pm
  15. I agree this is a fantastic review.
    I am ready to buy a new set and I must adnmit i am very confused at what is right for me.
    I’m 26 and My handicap is 15. I am really looking for something to assit in loosing a few more strokes.
    the new Callaway x22 have been released and look good.
    Some people say these are good for my range handicap, whilst others say titleist ap1 or the nike sumos.
    Would love to know what you think.

    Posted by Alan Bonnici | November 10, 2008, 7:36 pm
  16. These irons are the best thing to happen go my game. I never expected to hit so strait and far

    Posted by captain hook | February 21, 2009, 1:52 pm
  17. I’m in process of buying a set golf clubs. my options are callaway big bertha 2008 or Adam’s A3 or nike sumo. which one would you guys recommend?

    My handicap is 30+



    Posted by Adam | April 25, 2009, 12:47 am
  18. hey im not a very well golfer i have a very hig handicap i am looking at the nike sumo irons or the callaway big berth irons what do u suggest

    Posted by trey | June 11, 2009, 12:07 pm
  19. hello

    i am just wondering what would be more suited to me as i am upgrading my irons. these will be either nike sumo or the r7 taylormade.
    my handicap is 25 would much appriciate any suggestions ??


    Posted by Robert | August 1, 2009, 8:11 am
  20. Just bought a full set of nike golf clubs – the sumo irons, 23 deg sumo2 hybrid, 15 deg dymo2 3-wood, 11.5 deg dymo2 driver.

    and what a good decision I made!!!

    I am so pleased I bought these clubs and I highly recommend them to anyone in the mid-high handicap range.

    I went to a fitting/demo day and tried out the callaway big berthas, taylormade burners, king cobra SZs and ping g10s

    The sumos for me felt the most forgiving – and definitely provided the most distance and loft. They are truly outstanding – especially for them to be better than the more established co’s such as callaway, ping and taylormade.

    The driver, 11.5 dymo2, refuses to fade/draw – it’s such a great driver for those that struggle to get some good loft and frequently hit fairways – I thoroughly recommend this driver too.

    Try out all the clubs – and you’ll see what I mean!

    Posted by replay10 | August 2, 2009, 1:41 pm
  21. Robert,

    My father is around your handicap and is playing these sumo irons, he absolutely loves them. If you are comfortable at the 25 handicap, do not have a ton of time to practice, they are very forgiving and shot be a very ‘straight’ club. Pair it with some Top-Flite D2 golf balls, and you should be golden!

    Replay10, thanks for the mini review, great stuff!


    Posted by Sean | August 4, 2009, 5:52 am
  22. I like the way it works. But within few month, it’s get bored. Straight and fly high.. but no excitement.. feel to choppy.

    Great for high handycapper, but if you are boggie player, go Mizuno MX

    Posted by PJ | February 12, 2010, 11:37 pm
  23. I went and cheked out the sumo’s and to me they seemed alittle light, i havent got the chance to hit them yet but everyone i have talked to has said that the wideness on it is actualy a bad thing, im not sure where they are comming from, can you explain alittle more on the aspects of the wideness please?

    Posted by Cole Sayles | March 22, 2010, 12:36 am
  24. Great review! But, I need some advice. Currently I’m a 5.6 handicap (i usually play nine holes and average around 38) and I play Mizuno MP 67 irons. They’re pure blades, and they’re very difficult to hit without a near perfect swing. I tend to be quite consistent with them, but on my off days, golf is not very fun. I’m currently selling them on ebay and am looking around for a new set, one that’s MUCH more forgiving. Considering I hit my blades pretty well, do you think I would have trajectory issues (excessively high trajectory or ballooning are my worries) with the Nike SQ Sumos. I really like their looks, their focus on feel (at least for a game improvement irons set), and their forgiveness, but I’m afraid that their easy to hit design might hurt my iron game. Thanks!

    Posted by taylor | May 26, 2010, 2:45 pm
  25. taylor,

    While the Sumo’s may have relatively good feel for a super game improvement iron, coming from the 67s, you will probably find too much of a drop off in that department. I could be wrong though. You could find these pretty cheap on ebay these days, so might be worth picking up a set to try out for a couple of weeks. At this point, the price probably does not fluctuate much, so if you find you don’t like them and need to sell them again, probably won’t take much of a loss.

    Interesting that you would say that you feel it may hurt your iron game. I find that practicing with an iron with little to no feel (relatively speaking) does nothing to help my game. If I cannot ‘feel’ where I hit the ball on the face, how am I ever going to get better? I used to play with MP-33 irons, and made the switch to game improvement irons like yourself. While my scores went up in the short term, I certainly noticed my swing getting a little ‘lazy’ and felt like my ‘good’ shots, were not as great. So, I started hitting the range every now and then with the 7 iron from the MP-33 set. Hit 50 balls with that, and I usually tightened things up.

    I would check out some of these clubs at a local golf store, you may find these somewhat closer to the feel and trajectory of the 67s, but far more forgiving: Mizuno MX-300, Mizuno MP-52, Mizuno MP-57 or PING i15.

    We reviewed the MP-52s and the Ping i15s a while back. The shaft in the iron is certainly going to have some impact on the feel and trajectory as well, so keep that in mind. Here are the reviews:

    MP-52 Review

    PING i15 Review

    Geesh, this has turned into a blog post in itself! Thanks for the inspiration and let me know how it goes!


    Posted by Sean | May 27, 2010, 7:36 am


  1. [...] complete review of the Nike Sumo Irons has been posted on The Deep Rough, be sure to check it [...]

    Posted by Nike Sumo Irons - First Look Pictures » The Deep Rough | November 5, 2007, 11:45 am
  2. [...] be hit or miss. Unless the person you are buying for has come out and said, “I want a set of Nike Sumo irons“…I would be careful with this gift. Just because you never know what they are going to [...]

    Posted by Christmas Golf Gift Ideas » The Deep Rough | November 28, 2007, 1:51 pm
  3. [...] Burner XD irons for me. They were pretty similar distance wise to the Callaway X-20 irons or the Nike Sumo irons. The long irons got up very high. I was hitting the 5 iron about the same height as the 7 iron from [...]

    Posted by Review: TaylorMade R7 CGB Max Irons » The Deep Rough | January 21, 2008, 7:35 pm
  4. [...] few months ago I had a close look at the Sumo Irons. They will be releasing a new version of that set of irons which replaces the long irons with the [...]

    Posted by Nike Sumo Saturday » The Deep Rough | February 1, 2008, 11:47 am
  5. [...] high handicapper, looking for the most forgiving set of irons, have a look at our review of the Nike Sumo iron set. If you are looking for something a little more ‘workable’, but still [...]

    Posted by Nike Slingshot 4D Review » The Deep Rough | April 23, 2008, 10:52 am
  6. [...] Sumo – Complete Review – Ebay: [...]

    Posted by How to Save Money on Irons – Buy Used! » The Deep Rough | September 26, 2009, 3:56 pm

Post a comment


Golf Blogs

In My Bag

Golf Tools